Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Ems Rfp Decision topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board approves countywide 911 ambulance contracts after hours of debate
Summary
After a day-long public hearing, the Orange County Board of Supervisors approved staff recommendations to award 911 basic life‑support ambulance contracts for five exclusive operating areas to the highest‑scoring bidder; the vote passed 4–0 with one abstention following disputed claims about supplemental federal funding and contractor performance.
The Orange County Board of Supervisors voted to award five five‑year contracts for 911 basic life‑support ambulance services across the county’s exclusive operating areas (EOAs) after a multi‑hour public hearing and extensive testimony from emergency services providers, unions and local elected officials.
The board approved the staff recommendation to award contracts to the highest‑scoring proposer, Falcon Mobile Health (FALC), a decision the clerk recorded as carrying with four ayes and one abstention. Supervisor Vicente Sarmiento told the board he would abstain, citing concerns about the process and the limited discretion the board has under state rules governing exclusive operating areas.
Why it matters: the procurement outcome determines which companies will answer 911 basic life‑support calls across Orange County for the next five years and affects emergency system design, workforce continuity and potential access to supplemental federal Medicaid‑match revenue that some speakers said could flow to a public‑provider model.
Supporters of an alternative public‑private model urged the board to consider awarding zones to Orange County Fire Authority (OCFA) emergency and its private partner, arguing that pairing OCFA and a public‑provider partner could unlock millions in federal funds dedicated to Medi‑Cal transports that would be reinvested in local EMS innovations. Brian Fennessy, OCFA fire chief, asked supervisors to “use your authority to award contracts to the second ranked bidder” if doing so would serve the public interest and to ensure federal reimbursements would return to local EMS services.
“Dollars — $35 million in previously untapped federal health care dollars — would be allocated directly to EMS services in Orange County,” Phil Becerra, Santa Ana councilmember and OCFA board chair, said in support of an OCFA partnership.
Supporters of the staff‑recommended award urged the board to respect the competitive scoring process. Troy Hagen, chief commercial officer for Falcon Mobile Health, and other Falcon representatives emphasized that Falcon earned the highest score in all EOAs and highlighted incumbent experience and workforce continuity. Falcon representatives said their bid included planned investments in local EMS infrastructure and workforce supports.
Contested claims and responses: some public speakers accused Falcon of past contract compliance problems in other counties, and speakers backing OCFA described the potential scale of federal supplemental payments using the Ground Emergency Medical Transportation and related programs (GEMT/PPGMT). Opposing witnesses warned the board that the supplemental funding figures were provisional: county staff told supervisors the federal supplemental program required separate DHCS and federal approvals and that specific dollar totals were not guaranteed for 2025.
Mindy Wintersley, director for specialized medical services at the county Health Care Agency, explained that the RFP process is regulated by the state Emergency Medical Services Authority (EMSA) and that deviations from the RFP’s evaluation framework would require state review. County counsel warned the board that choosing a lower‑ranked proposer absent a legal, well‑documented reason would invite litigation and could jeopardize the state’s approval.
What the board decided: following lengthy public comment and board discussion, the board approved the staff recommendation to award 911 basic life‑support contracts to the highest‑scoring proposer (Falcon Mobile Health) for EOAs A–E. The clerk recorded the roll call and the motion carried with four ayes and one abstention.
What’s next: supervisors and staff discussed avenues for closer study and potential pilot projects — including single‑unit ALS/BLS pilots and earlier state coordination for future procurements — but no further action altering today’s award was taken. The Health Care Agency will proceed with contract finalization and state notifications as required by EMSA rules.
Quote: “This would be the first fire‑agency ambulance provider partnership in Orange County,” Phil Becerra said in urging consideration of an alternative award. “Every single penny of which would go directly to Orange County EMS innovation.”
Ending: The board closed the public hearing after the vote and moved to other agenda items and closed session as scheduled.
