Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Waste Management topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
County reviews GFL rate notice and weighs bringing residential pickup in‑house
Summary
County Manager Thomas Weaver told the July 28 work session that the county received a GFL rate-notice tied to CPI and presented an in-house alternative that staff estimates could save roughly $92,000 annually; Weaver provided multiple, inconsistent figures in the meeting record and staff will audit the contract before acting.
County Manager Thomas Weaver told the Commission on July 28 that the county's residential trash contract with GFL is subject to a price change tied to CPI and that residents and the county should expect a rate adjustment that staff estimated would take effect in roughly 60 days.
At the work session Weaver gave multiple figures while describing the county’s current costs and options. He first stated a current annual cost of $480,137 for residential pickup, then later said residential costs would move "from $312,000 to $342,000" under the contractor’s adjustment. Weaver also said bringing collection in-house could save about $92,000 annually but that figure did not include the capital cost of purchasing a collection truck; he said the county could acquire vehicles with SPLOST funds. Weaver asked staff to review the contract language and return with options; he said he would check the specific contract clause that ties increases to CPI.
Why it matters: solid-waste pickup is a recurring contracted operating expense that affects the county budget and potentially residents’ utility bills. At the meeting commissioners expressed concern about past enforcement at the recycling center and questioned contractor compliance with payment and collection rules.
What the record shows: Weaver said the county received a letter from the contractor and that increases would be applied approximately 60 days after notice. The work-session record contains differing numerical statements; the county manager acknowledged he would retrieve the contract and present exact language and figures for the Commission to consider.
Next steps: staff will pull the GFL contract, confirm the indexing clause and precise current and projected costs, and present a formal recommendation and a possible procurement or in‑house operations plan at an upcoming meeting.
