Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Time Zone Change topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Panel debates plan to keep Georgia on daylight time by shifting to Atlantic standard time

Georgia Senate Health & Human Services Committee (floor) · March 18, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

A substitute to HB 154 would ask the U.S. Department of Transportation to move Georgia into the Atlantic time zone so the state can remain on daylight-saving hours year‑round; sponsors cited health benefits, opponents warned of cross-border business and school‑bus safety issues. Committee discussion showed strong preliminary support but concerns remain.

A substitute version of House Bill 154 drew an extended committee debate after its sponsor proposed using a federal time-zone boundary petition to make Georgia effectively remain on daylight-saving hours year-round by moving the state into Atlantic Standard Time.

What the bill would do: The sponsor told the committee the bill directs the governor’s office to petition the U.S. Department of Transportation to adopt a time-zone boundary change that would place Georgia in Atlantic Standard Time. Under federal law, a state may seek a boundary change; if approved, the change would make Georgia’s clocks match daylight‑saving time year‑round without congressional action.

Arguments for the measure: Supporters emphasized health and sleep benefits tied to eliminating the biannual clock shift. The sponsor cited studies and long-standing medical concern about a short-term increase in heart attacks and other harms around clock changes and said the change would provide “an extra hour of sunshine at the end of every day.”

Concerns raised: Several senators questioned the proposal’s economic and practical effects if neighboring states do not follow suit. One member warned that schoolchildren might wait for buses in darker winter mornings if Georgia shifts without adjacent states, and others urged coordination across the Eastern Seaboard. Business scheduling and interstate commerce impacts drew repeated attention.

Committee response and next steps: Senators discussed whether leadership in nearby states could coordinate a regional change; the sponsor said he had spoken with representatives and leaders in Florida and South Carolina. Committee hand-counts of support during the session indicated majority backing in the room, but members asked for further consideration of cross-border logistics and implementation steps. The bill remains under committee consideration.