Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Medicaid Funding topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Orange County adopts resolution opposing proposed federal Medicaid cuts
Summary
After hearing more than a dozen public commenters and staff briefings, the Orange County Board of Supervisors adopted a nonbinding resolution asking the county’s congressional delegation to oppose proposed federal Medicaid (Medi-Cal) spending cuts. The board corrected funding figures in the text and passed the motion 3–0 with one abstention.
The Orange County Board of Supervisors on May 6 adopted a nonbinding resolution asking the county’s congressional delegation to oppose proposed federal Medicaid spending cuts, a measure supporters said would protect health care access for more than 1,000,000 county residents.
Chair Doug Chaffee moved the amended resolution after brief staff corrections to the draft. The board instructed staff to send letters of opposition to Orange County members of Congress and added clauses underscoring the long-term costs of cutting preventive care and the role Medi‑Cal plays in behavioral health services.
Dozens of residents and health advocates urged the supervisors to pass the resolution during public comment. “I’m here today to urge you to pass the resolution opposing federal cuts to Medicaid,” said Chris Noble of Health Access California, adding that local hospitals, clinics and community programs depend on Medi‑Cal funding.
Public speakers and coalition organizers described local impacts, from small-business ripple effects to services for seniors and people with disabilities. Speakers repeatedly cited a county figure for annual Medicaid-related spending; staff and the board corrected a formatting error in the draft to list that figure as $12,440,000,000 rather than an earlier misprinted number.
Veronica Kelly, director of the county’s Health Care Agency, told supervisors that the county is budgeted to draw down roughly $180 million in federal financial participation this year and that proposed cuts could affect other federal programs that fund public‑health work.
Supervisors debated the resolution’s language: some members wanted to oppose “all” cuts outright, while others asked for narrower phrasing pending details of any federal proposals. Ultimately the board retained broad language opposing the cuts but incorporated additional whereas clauses and technical corrections.
The motion carried with three votes in favor and one abstention. The board’s action is nonbinding but is intended to signal to federal lawmakers the county’s opposition to reductions that local officials and advocates say could disrupt hospitals, clinics and programs serving vulnerable residents.
The board directed staff to send the letters to county congressional representatives and to incorporate the corrected figures and updated language when the resolution is finalized.
