Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Pfd Restoration topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee adopts substitute to restore PFDs for certain wrongful convictions
Summary
The House State Affairs Committee adopted a committee substitute for HB 189 that narrows eligibility for Permanent Fund Dividend back-payments to people wrongfully convicted (innocence), excluding dismissals that were part of plea agreements under Rule 11; members raised fiscal and litigation questions and set an amendment deadline of March 18 at 5 p.m.
The Alaska House State Affairs Committee on March 17 adopted a committee substitute for House Bill 189, a measure intended to restore Permanent Fund Dividend (PFD) payments to people determined to have been wrongfully convicted. The substitute clarifies which dismissals qualify for PFD restoration and adds a transition window for previously identified cases.
Representative Donna Mears, the bill sponsor, said the bill’s aim is to benefit people convicted who were later determined to be innocent. Stewart Relay, committee staff, summarized the substitute’s two changes: a new specification in section 1, subsection (i)(1) that a dismissal tied to a plea agreement under Rule 11 of the Alaska Rules of Criminal Procedure does not qualify as evidence of innocence; and a clarification in subsection (j) that receiving a deposit into a restorative-justice account does not bar a back payment of a dividend.
Nancy Mead, general counsel to the Alaska court system, told the committee the language follows established practice to distinguish dismissals entered as part of plea bargains from dismissals that reflect a finding of innocence. "If your case is dismissed as part of a plea in another case, that is not as strong an indicator of actual innocence," Mead said.
Members questioned the bill’s fiscal implications and possible litigation consequences. Representative St. Clair pressed whether restoring dividends could amount to duplicate payments in litigation claims; Mears cautioned that the committee should not assume how future lawsuits might play out and noted that the Fairbanks Four and other previously identified cases would be covered under the bill’s transition language. Mears told the committee that staff had identified five past cases over recent decades that fit the category, but said future counts are unknown.
Chair Carrick removed her earlier objection and the committee substitute was adopted as the working document. The committee set HB 189 aside for further consideration and reiterated an amendment deadline of March 18 at 5 p.m.
Next steps: the committee will take the bill up again at a later hearing and will continue to collect amendments and any additional fiscal detail.
