Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Zoning Text Amendment topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning board approves zoning rules for freestanding emergency facilities after adding LERP and spacing limits
Summary
The Planning & Zoning Board recommended approval, 6–0, of a city‑initiated zoning text amendment (ordinance 57‑67) to create conditional‑use standards for freestanding emergency facilities; the board amended the ordinance to expand allowable districts (including LERP), allow arterial frontage with side‑street access, remove a school‑zone restriction, and recommend a one‑mile spacing guideline.
The Planning & Zoning Board on Jan. 6 recommended approval of a city‑initiated zoning text amendment (ordinance No. 57‑67) to define and regulate freestanding emergency facilities (FEFs) as a conditional use in selected commercial districts, subject to parking, ambulance‑loading, access, and proximity criteria. The board voted 6–0 after adopting several member amendments expanding where the use could be allowed.
Tamash Vermaan, chief planning administrator, said the ordinance would define the use, require one parking space per 175 square feet for outpatient surgery centers (as amended earlier by ordinance 56‑98), require a dedicated ambulance loading area, and require direct access from an arterial road and no adjacency to single‑family residential zoning. Staff proposed medical center, city commercial general (CG), city commercial high office (CHO), and B4 business districts as initial areas where FEFs could be allowed.
Board members and members of the public questioned the narrow geographic coverage on the staff map and the arterial‑access constraint, which staff described as a conservative first step to limit impacts. Several public speakers — including architect Leslie Del Monte and developer Larry Silver — urged extending the ordinance into LERP/LARP and other commercial districts and requested that staff consult fire and police data on ambulance and public‑safety impacts.
Board members discussed potential amendments including adding the LERP district to the allowed locations, removing the school‑zone restriction, adjusting the arterial‑frontage wording to permit side‑street access where the site fronts an arterial, and imposing a distance/separation requirement (members proposed a one‑mile spacing guideline) to avoid clustering. After debate the board voted to recommend approval with those amendments.
The motion passed 6–0. The recommendation — with the board’s requested amendments — will go to City Council for first reading and further review by staff and the city attorney as part of the ordinance process.
