Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Solid Waste topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Garbage-rate increases, truck decals and safety gear debated and approved for later action
Summary
Members approved adjustments to solid-waste charges for rural and outfitter services, authorized replacement decals for the garbage truck and discussed equipment repairs and PPE reimbursements; the body scheduled further follow-up on door repairs and workplace-safety policy.
Get email alerts on the Solid Waste topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Members spent a substantial portion of the meeting on public-works and solid-waste matters. The public-works representative (speaker S4) explained a proposed renewal of the local solid-waste agreement and recommended aligning town fees with an approximately 14% increase the town adopted. After discussion about billing timing and rural service differences, the members agreed to raise rural and special-service fees and voted to approve the recommended adjustments.
S4 also described a decal replacement for the garbage truck, noting the initial template cost of about $190 for two decals with lower unit costs for subsequent decals. Chair (S2) sought a motion to approve the decal expense and said the design would be emailed to members; the motion was carried.
The board discussed the new garbage truck's capacity and safety features, options for reusing tires or auctioning older vehicles, and potential door repairs for a building that might cost about $15,000. Members noted the garbage fund balance and agreed to revisit major repairs and necessary budget amendments at the next meeting.
A lengthy discussion focused on required safety clothing and personal protective equipment for wastewater and public-works staff. The chair and members reviewed items listed as necessary (safety glasses, face shields, steel-toe boots, slip-resistant boots, high-visibility clothing, chemical-resistant coveralls and fall-protection tie-off points) and debated who should pay. A motion to reimburse employees up to $300 for boots was discussed but initially failed for lack of a second; a member later seconded a motion to revisit the issue at the next meeting and to consider codifying PPE requirements in personnel policy.
Members also raised workplace-safety items including respiratory protection, possible emergency recovery devices and whether a formal lone-worker policy exists; the group agreed to research required items and address them at a future meeting.
The meeting ended after routine committee reports and an adjournment.
