Citizen Portal

Get email alerts on the Legal Settlements topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Orange County Board of Supervisors reports two closed‑session settlements, votes 4–0 with one absence

Orange County Board of Supervisors · May 7, 2024

Summary

The Orange County Board of Supervisors reported 4–0 votes approving proposed settlements in Bueller v. County of Orange and Wynne v. County of Orange, with Supervisor Foley absent. Harmon said final approvals remain pending and that details will be released by the CEO Risk Management office.

The Orange County Board of Supervisors reported that it approved proposed settlements in two closed‑session cases, Bueller v. County of Orange and Wynne v. County of Orange, by unanimous 4–0 votes with Supervisor Foley absent.

Harmon, who read the closed‑session report to the board, said that the approvals are “subject to the final approval of others” and that “as soon as the proposed settlement becomes final, details will be made available in the office of CEO risk management to any person who inquires.”

Harmon said the votes on both items were recorded as 4 in favor and one absence; he named the supervisors who voted in favor as Wagner, Chaffee, Doe and Sarmiento and stated that Supervisor Foley was absent for both approvals. He repeated that the settlements themselves remain contingent on further approvals outside the board before details are released.

The reports delivered at the meeting contained no dollar amounts or other substantive terms of the settlements; Harmon said those specifics will be available from CEO Risk Management once the settlements are final. The board took no other reportable action during the closed session.

The meeting concluded when the chair thanked attendees and adjourned the session.

AI generated

The text on this page is AI generated. Summaries, highlights, analysis, and video transcripts are all produced from the original source material.

AI can make mistakes, so if you spot one, and we will fix it for everyone.

Note: the source content is unaltered by us. Any content source we link to, be it a video, an audio recording, or a document, is presented exactly as its publisher released it. That publisher is usually a government body, sometimes an individual official or another organisation.

Source