Committee moves bill to curb invasive workplace surveillance, including facial, gait and emotion recognition
Loading...
Summary
AB 1883 (Bridal) would restrict or prohibit certain workplace surveillance technologies and set guardrails for others; unions, privacy advocates and firefighters supported the measure, while business and industry groups urged narrower rules and raised enforcement and preemption concerns.
Assemblymember Bridal presented AB 1883, a measure aiming to prohibit or strictly limit use of invasive workplace surveillance technologies — including facial, gait and emotion recognition — and to place guardrails on other analytic tools used to monitor employees.
Labor and privacy groups described concrete examples of surveillance harms and discrimination. Yvonne Fernandez of the California Federation of Labor Unions told the committee that employers now have access to tools that can continuously monitor conversations and interactions and that such surveillance can chill protected activity. Shane Guzman, representing Teamsters California, said emotional-recognition tools can generate biased outcomes and risk worker safety.
Business and industry witnesses raised counterarguments: the California Chamber and other groups said the bill as drafted reads like a ban and could block legitimate safety or security uses, and they urged the legislature to consider narrower guardrails and clearer enforcement mechanisms. Civil-justice and small-business groups warned of exposure to punitive damages and forum-shopping risk under the bill's private-right-of-action language.
Committee members engaged on the balance between protecting workers and preserving important safety or operational uses. The committee voted to move AB 1883 and referred it to the privacy and consumer protection committee for further refinement and possible amendments.
