Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Procurement topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commissioners discuss excavator, mower and attachments; direct staff to write bid specs
Summary
Staff reviewed bids for excavator models (130 vs 135) and mower/disc attachments, trade‑in options and required rubber tracks and hydraulic flow. Commissioners asked staff to prepare specifications and put equipment out to bid so mowing and dam‑inspection schedules can be met before spring.
The commission reviewed vendor proposals for a new excavator/loader and mower attachments intended for county mowing, channel work and auto‑gate maintenance. Staff compared options labeled as the '130' and '135' models, noting differences in turning radius, back height, hydraulic flow and available attachments such as a thumb bucket, CryptoClaw and rubber track options. One machine option included rubber tracks and more attachments in a single bid price; another offered a high‑back configuration with higher resale value for roughly $15,000 more.
Commissioners discussed trade‑ins (a backhoe offered at $70,000), the need for rubber tracks to protect sidewalks, and whether the county should specify rubber‑track or tire configurations in bid documents. Staff recommended developing a spec sheet and publicly advertising for bids; commissioners agreed to proceed and to schedule mowing before next spring. The commission also reviewed a separate disc quote (under $80,000) and noted that if no alternate manufacturers are available, the county can accept quotes without a formal bid process for that item.
No final purchase was approved at the meeting; the commission directed staff to prepare bid specifications and bring bid openings and any required approvals back to the agenda.
