Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Budget Superior Court topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Pacific County adopts budget supplement to add a superior-court position, net $30,000 to general fund
Summary
Pacific County commissioners adopted Supplement/Amendment #4 to the FY2025 budget to convert a temporary superior-court staffing request into one regular FTE, reduce juvenile court services by 0.3 FTE and increase the general fund by $30,000. The board approved the resolution after a public hearing.
Get email alerts on the Budget Superior Court topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Pacific County commissioners adopted Resolution 2025-049 on July 22, 2025, approving Supplement/Amendment Number 4 to the fiscal year 2025 budget, a change that adds one regular superior-court position while reducing juvenile court services by 0.3 full-time equivalent (FTE).
At a public hearing, county staff member Mr. Plackinger described the change as a reclassification of staffing after follow-up discussions with the superior court judge. "We re-advertised in the supplement 4 to reduce 0.3 FTEs from the juvenile court services fund, add a regular 1 FTE position within superior court — there's a net change to the general fund, 0.7 FTE," Mr. Plackinger said. He summarized the dollar impact as a $50,000 increase in superior court funding offset by a $20,000 reduction in juvenile court services for a net $30,000 to the general fund.
The amendment responds to operational changes the judge described: Wahkiakum (transcript spelling) County no longer provides administrative support that had previously assisted the judge, requiring more regular staffing in Pacific County. County staff and the juvenile court administrator had discussed the change before the hearing, and commissioners said they had the necessary background information from an earlier public workshop.
Commissioners moved and adopted the resolution by voice vote following the hearing. The motion record in the transcript shows the board indicated unanimous support; individual roll-call votes were not recorded by name in the public transcript.
Next steps: with the amendment adopted, the board also authorized posting and advertising for the related superior-court position (a separate personnel action later in the meeting). The county announced that recruitment will proceed under the approved fund appropriation. The board scheduled continuation of remaining business and held an executive session later the same morning on litigation, reporting no action afterward.
