Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Housing topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Pacific County accepts three HUD grants to support youth homelessness and permanent supportive housing

Pacific County Board of County Commissioners · September 23, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The board approved three U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Continuum of Care grants covering youth demonstration supportive services, youth rapid rehousing, and continued permanent supportive housing for chronically homeless households; health department staff were credited for securing the funds.

Pacific County commissioners approved three Continuum of Care grant agreements from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development aimed at addressing youth homelessness and to continue permanent supportive housing for chronically homeless households with disabilities.

A commissioner moved to approve grant WA0501Y0T012403 for a youth homeless demonstration supportive-services-only program, grant WA0588Y0T012401 for a youth rapid rehousing program, and grant WA0352L0T012409 for continued permanent supportive housing. A county staff member thanked health department staff for their work in facilitating the federal awards, saying the grant work is “a big lift” and calling out specific staff by name for playing roles in preparing applications and administration.

Commissioners discussed the grants’ importance and noted accountability requirements associated with federal funding; the board approved all three grants by voice vote. The transcript does not include the awards’ dollar amounts or detailed budget lines in the public record.

Per the meeting record, staff will proceed with confirming the director’s signature and administering the grants through the health department. The board did not discuss detailed program budgets or subrecipient arrangements during the public meeting; those specifics were not specified in the transcript.