Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Animal Control topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission and staff push back on misinformation about domestic animal ordinance review
Summary
Commissioners and county staff said social‑media claims about animal taxes and mandatory fees are false, urged residents to attend the Domestic Animal Task Force meetings, and emphasized the task force is still drafting recommendations that must come before the commission for any action.
Chair opened the evening by reminding attendees of public‑comment rules and then commissioners turned to an extended discussion of the Domestic Animal Task Force (DATF) after residents raised concerns about documents and social‑media posts.
CEO Everett said the claims circulating online were incorrect and called them “total misinformation,” urging residents to check official minutes rather than rely on social media. "You'll never be taxed on your animals. I can promise you that," Everett said, and he encouraged anyone with concerns to attend the task force meetings so the public can see the process firsthand.
Multiple commissioners and staff described the task force as an advisory body charged with revising decades‑old county animal ordinances. A commissioner (speaker 6) said the task force is gathering subject‑matter specialists and public input and that "the report that we will end up getting from the domestic animal task force will then end up being vetted by the commission." The county attorney noted that the task force itself has been asking for more public involvement.
Several residents said they had seen draft documents and petitions online and were alarmed at language they read. Bud Mayotte, who said he attended a task force meeting, told the commission that materials labeled “ordinance 11” and “11a” were circulating and that hundreds of signatures appeared on a related petition. "I'm making you aware of what I witnessed when I was there," Mayotte said, urging clearer public notice and longer lead time before moving recommendations to the commission.
Commissioners and staff responded that the DATF meetings are public, that minutes and agendas are posted on the county website, and that the task force had changed meeting dates to accelerate work while trying to meet across the county’s development districts. Commissioners recognized a communications gap and agreed to additional outreach: the CEO said he would place larger notices in the local paper and reiterated that no ordinance change has been adopted by the commission.
The commission emphasized process: the DATF is to develop recommendations for the commission to consider; final ordinance language and any regulatory changes must come to the commission in a formal agenda item and vote. In the meantime, officials encouraged residents to attend upcoming DATF meetings and to use posted minutes and agendas as the record of what has — and has not — been proposed.
