Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Impact Fees topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Mendon council approves funding to begin impact-fee studies for parks and trails

Mendon City Council · February 12, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Council approved up to $18,000 to fund impact-fee analyses for parks and trails and agreed to seek outside funding for road and public-safety studies; Treasurer Daphne Carlson said impact fees cannot be used to fix existing deficiencies and must be spent within 5–6 years.

Mendon — The Mendon City Council voted to fund initial impact-fee analyses and to pursue partner funding for additional studies on Feb. 12.

City Treasurer Daphne Carlson outlined a plan for four impact-fee studies to help new development pay for growth-related infrastructure. She noted Mendon already charges water and sidewalk impact fees and said new fees must meet statutory restrictions: they "cannot be used to cure deficiencies in public facilities," cannot raise an existing level of service, and must be spent within roughly five to six years.

Carlson recommended updating the sidewalk/trails and pathway fees and conducting additional studies for road and public-safety impacts. Councilmember Ben Watkins moved to explore funding options and approved up to $18,000 for parks and trails/trails-and-pathway analyses, while asking staff to pursue BRAG and other agency funding for the remaining studies. Councilmember Brian Myers seconded the motion; Myers, Garbe, Watkins, Heers and Jepsen voted aye and the motion passed.

Council discussed timing: Carlson estimated study and hearing timelines at about two and a half to three months before fees could be charged. The minutes record that the city is too late to assess fees on homes with building permits already posted and that impact fees cannot be assessed against construction of internal accessory dwelling units.

The council directed staff to explore grant options and suggested some funding could be shifted from the snow-removal budget this fiscal year.

Next steps include commissioning the analyses and scheduling required hearings before any fees are adopted.