Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use Signs topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Grove City council overturns BZA decision, blocking electronic sign for American Legion Post 164
Summary
After public testimony from veterans and months of review, Grove City Council voted 4‑3 to overturn a Board of Zoning Appeals variance that would have allowed an electronic sign for American Legion Post 164, citing code consistency and concern about precedent.
Grove City Council voted to overturn a Board of Zoning Appeals decision that had granted variances permitting an electronic sign for American Legion Post 164 at 3363 McDowell Road. The council approved Resolution CR‑126, which rescinds the BZA’s variance and prevents the digital sign from being installed.
Three veterans spoke in favor of the new sign during the council meeting, emphasizing the post’s community and emergency‑information services. Ken Flutie said the donated sign — purchased for about $20,000 — is needed to help the public locate the post and to display timely information without relying on physically changing letters. Jason Norris, finance officer for American Legion Pascale Post 164, told council the sign could also share city and township messages and argued that modern signage supports both veterans and civic communication.
Councilmember Burrows, who sponsored the appeal, said she sought a review because the BZA approval included 11 stipulations and because the sign as purchased did not comply with existing code. Burrows told the council she had discussed alternatives with the American Legion, including a changeable‑letter sign estimated at roughly $8,000, and had explored grant options and resale of the donated sign.
Chairman Halinga and other council members walked through the BZA process, explaining that the BZA had developed 11 stipulations (brightness limits, change frequency limits and a removal requirement if the property is sold) intended to reduce impacts. Supporters on the BZA described the decision as a tailored, case‑by‑case exception, not a general code rewrite.
After debate about precedent and code modernization, council conducted a roll call vote. The motion to overturn the variance carried 4‑3: Holt, Burrows, Omar and Anderson voted to overturn; Berry, Sturm and Palinga voted to let the BZA decision stand. The council’s ruling means the digital sign will not be permitted under the appealed variance.
The council did not adopt an immediate replacement policy; several members said the episode highlighted a need to review Grove City’s sign code. The council noted the BZA’s 11 stipulations and encouraged further work to reconcile existing nonconforming signs in the city with the ordinance.
The appeal and vote concluded under Resolution CR‑126. The American Legion representatives thanked the council for the conversation and were encouraged to discuss alternative, code‑compliant signage options.
