Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Rezoning topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Neighbors oppose rezoning for duplex at 3472 Grant Avenue; council advances matter to second reading
Summary
A rezoning request for 3472 Grant Avenue to allow a two‑family dwelling drew opposition from immediate neighbors citing parking, flooding and short‑term rental concerns. Petitioner said the site aligns with existing D‑1 zoning patterns; council set the ordinance for second reading and public hearing.
Get email alerts on the Rezoning topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council heard public comment and a petitioner presentation on Ordinance C37‑25, a request to rezone 3472 Grant Avenue from R‑2 (single‑family) to D‑1 (duplex) to permit construction of a two‑family dwelling.
Rebecca Mott, representing the petitioner, said the corridor already contains widespread D‑1 zoning and the project reflects market demand for multi‑unit housing near the town center. “The town center plan recognizes this site as a town‑center core neighborhood … duplex or higher‑density multifamily use is consistent with the character of the neighborhood,” Mott said.
Planning staff told council staff had recommended approval but noted the Planning Commission did not forward that recommendation. Neighbors including Wayne Morris and Nancy Pinnell spoke in opposition, citing on‑street parking pressures, the narrow 48‑foot lot, flooding and a fear that the property’s current use as a short‑term rental could be amplified if converted to a duplex. Morris said he feared increased transient occupancy and pointed to recent federal tax incentives that make short‑term rental models more attractive.
Council members asked clarifying questions about neighborhood compatibility and the provenance of a support letter dated 07/03/2023; Mott acknowledged that the client had provided the letter and said she believed the signers were aware it was being used in support of the application.
After public testimony and council discussion, the item was advanced as a second reading and public hearing. Council did not take final action to rezone the property at this meeting; any future vote will follow the second reading and any additional public comment.
If the petitioner returns, council and staff said they will weigh neighborhood concerns about parking, short‑term rentals and flood risk against the city’s Town Center land‑use objectives.
