Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Parklet topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Big Horn owner’s proposal to buy downtown parklet is tabled for logistics and safety review

Anaconda Deer Lodge County Commission · February 18, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Vanessa Romero proposed buying and storing a Discovering Anaconda parklet for seasonal, permanent use at the Big Horn; commissioners raised traffic and safety concerns and voted to table the request and ask planning staff to return with a logistics recommendation.

Vanessa Romero, owner of the Big Horn, proposed that her business purchase a Discovering Anaconda parklet and use it each summer as a permanent seasonal attraction. Romero said the unit was structurally sound, that she invested about $2,000 in aesthetic improvements, and that she would arrange storage and teardown if the commission approved the arrangement.

Commissioners and planning staff questioned whether the county would be authorizing a purchase or should instead treat such uses as a special-event or seasonal lease for county right-of-way. Several commissioners raised pedestrian and traffic-safety concerns given the parklet’s location near a turning lane and the local hospital access route, and one commissioner suggested sidewalk tables and a special-event permit as safer alternatives. Planning staff recommended that the applicant and county planning staff work together on logistics and a proposal to be considered at a work session.

After public comment (some residents praised the parklet’s economic and tourism benefits; others emphasized safety and access), the commission moved, seconded and unanimously voted to table the purchase request and direct planning staff to meet with Romero and return with a recommendation on whether the use should proceed as a seasonal permit, lease or other arrangement.

The action was procedural: the commission did not authorize a purchase or set fees at the meeting. The commission asked planning staff to evaluate traffic/safety impacts, storage and permitting options, and to prepare a draft proposal for a future work session.