Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Land Use topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Residents and Hope Center Ministries Spar Over Compliance, Zoning and Occupancy

Cheatham County Legislative Body · March 1, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Dozens of residents and church leaders spoke during public comment for and against a proposed Hope Center Ministries site on Spring Creek/Poplar Ridge, and county officials said fire-safety and zoning deficiencies must be fixed before occupancy continues.

Dozens of residents and church leaders took turns during the public forum at Cheatham County’s Aug. 19 legislative meeting urging the commission either to support or to oppose a proposed Hope Center Ministries location on Spring Creek Road and Poplar Ridge Road.

The public forum, opened by Chairman Tim Williamson, featured supporters including Stephen Polk, identified in the minutes as director of Hope Center Ministries, and several local pastors and congregation members who said the ministry serves youth and community needs. Opponents included multiple nearby property owners who raised concerns about the site’s suitability and compliance with county rules.

The exchange drew direct attention from county staff. Franklin Wilkinson of the county Building Department said an inspection by the fire marshal found deficiencies. County Attorney Michael Bligh said the ministry must ‘‘comply with the zoning and permit requirements’’ and indicated he would speak to the ministry’s attorney about reducing the facility’s occupancy until the correct permits and any needed zone changes are obtained.

Commissioner James Hedgepath told the body he considered the Hope Center a ‘‘first class facility’’ but reiterated that compliance with zoning and permits is required. The minutes show no formal motion or vote regarding the ministry itself during the Aug. 19 meeting.

Why it matters: The exchange highlights a common local-government tension: community support for social services versus neighbors’ concerns about land use and regulatory compliance. Until permits are obtained and inspections show compliance, county officials signaled they expect occupancy and operations to be limited.

Next steps: County Attorney Michael Bligh said he plans to consult with the ministry’s lawyer; the record shows staff action and potential zoning or permit filings as the likely next procedural steps rather than an immediate policy decision by the commission.