Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Housing Ethics topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Housing authority disclosure flags potential contractor conflict involving Habitat for Humanity
Summary
A housing-authority disclosure told Lafayette officials that Habitat for Humanity sought $23,600 in HOME funds for unexpected sewer work at 2150 Powder House Lane and disclosed a potential conflict because a board member has ties to the contractor; Habitat will seek a HUD exception under 24 CFR §92.356.
Get email alerts on the Housing Ethics topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Cara Boyles, a legal department representative, told the Lafayette board that Habitat for Humanity of Greater Lafayette requested $23,600 in HOME funds to cover unexpected construction costs at 2150 Powder House Lane after a nonstandard 14-foot-deep sewer lateral required work by Anderson Plumbing.
"Habitat for Humanity of Greater Lafayette builds energy efficient homes for low and moderate income households, some funded through the home investment partnership program," Boyles said, reading a federal disclosure required under 24 CFR section 92.356. She said Anderson Plumbing performed the work and that Zane Anderson serves on Habitat's board and also works for Anderson Plumbing; at the time of the work, his father owned one-third of Anderson Plumbing.
Boyles said Mr. Anderson did not participate in contracting negotiations or approval of the project, that Habitat considered other contractors before selecting Anderson Plumbing, and that the agreement "appears fair and reasonable." She said Lafayette Housing Authority learned of the potential conflict on Jan. 13, 2026, and that Habitat will submit a request for a HUD exception as required by federal rule.
Boyles told the board that for future HOME-funded contracts, Mr. Anderson will not participate in any decision-making involving Anderson Plumbing and Habitat will document procurement to ensure full compliance with HOME program requirements and federal regulations. She said no board action was required at the meeting and that Habitat representatives were present to answer questions.
The board did not vote on any action related to the disclosure during the meeting.

