Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Code Enforcement topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council members press staff to revisit magistrate stipulation and fine in long-running Danberg case
Summary
Councilors questioned a proposed $9,100 stipulation and multi-year compliance timeline tied to a special magistrate's order in a long-running Danberg development compliance matter and asked staff to provide the magistrate formula and consider policy changes for large development-order violations.
Several City Council members pressed city staff on a proposed stipulation and fine tied to a long-running code-compliance matter involving a development (Danberg), signaling concern that a formulaic $9,100 settlement amount and an extended completion timeline would set a poor precedent.
During public comment, a resident (identified as Mr. Anjane) criticized special magistrates as "not from the city of Boca Raton" and alleged backdoor negotiations had converted adjudication into negotiation, warning the process could be postponed through elections. The resident urged council action to prevent indefinite delays.
City Manager Brown summarized the magistrate hearing: the city presented a certification for $87,000 in fines, and the magistrate directed the parties to confer. Brown said the parties met and a proposed stipulation sets specific compliance dates and provides that if those dates are missed the city will return to certify fines.
Deputy Mayor Drucker and other council members voiced concerns about the proposed amount and timeline. Drucker said the $9,100 figure "is not a substantial fee for violating the code" and proposed a higher fine, saying she thought $50,000 would be more appropriate given years of noncompliance. Council members discussed whether the magistrate's authority should be supplemented by a policy that allows large or development-order cases to come before council for review.
City staff said the magistrate decision is final under current code and statute and is appealable to circuit court, and city attorneys indicated staff will provide the formula behind the $9,100 calculation. Councilors directed staff to look into policy options and to provide additional facts and the calculation before the case returns to the magistrate on Sept. 11.
