Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Housing And Social Services topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Neighbors and city staff question Brighter Day Recovery plan for 11 Lincoln Street; board takes no vote
Summary
The board heard testimony for and against a variance to convert 11 Lincoln Street into a low-intensity residential recovery facility. Neighbors raised safety and success-rate concerns; the city described zoning limits and lot-size thresholds. The board debated postponement versus denial and took no final vote during the recorded session.
The board heard a public hearing on a variance request from an applicant seeking to convert 11 Lincoln Street from an assisted-living facility to a low-intensity residential recovery program operated by Brighter Day Recovery.
Neighbors and an attorney representing local residents spoke against the application, questioning the program’s success rates, the suitability of locating a residential facility near Saint Charles School and a popular commons, and possible public-safety implications. Clyde Nutter, speaking for a neighbor, asked for data on outcomes and expressed concern about increased foot traffic and impacts on children at the nearby school.
Errol Dewey Maslar, who identified himself as the owner/operator of a nearby assisted-living residence, described mobility and life-safety constraints in the existing building (noting stairs and evacuation concerns) and said the current configuration creates practical hardship for continued assisted-living use.
Joshua Caldwell of Brighter Day Recovery said the program focuses on phased reintegration, employment and case management, and emphasized that residents would be post-detox and participate in structured programming rather than unsupervised activities. The applicant’s representative reiterated that this would not be an inpatient detox unit but a transitional residential program.
City staff reviewed the zoning chart and maps, noting that residential facilities above six residents are not permitted in the R-2 zone except in limited locations and that the subject parcel is an existing nonconformity (11 Lincoln Street is approximately 6,534 sq ft while special-exception thresholds would require much larger lot area per resident). Staff also noted alternatives on the zoning map where the use could be permitted and cautioned that the board must consider proximity to schools and parks when judging public interest.
Board members debated the application. Several said they were inclined to deny the variance because they felt the application did not meet the hardship or spirit-of-ordinance criteria and because of the site’s proximity to a school and a frequently used park. Another member suggested postponing the decision to allow more time to review the submitted materials. The transcript ends with the board moving to the next agenda item; there was no recorded final vote on the Brighter Day Recovery application during the session.
Because no decision was recorded, the application remains under consideration and the applicant or members may request the item be taken up again at a later meeting.
