Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Title IX topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Siren board adopts updated Title IX and nondiscrimination policies amid ongoing litigation

Siren School District Board of Education · July 30, 2024
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The board adopted updated Title IX policy 1-13, related rule and exhibit, and a revised nondiscrimination policy 4-11 after administrators said the district was advised by legal counsel and the Wisconsin Association of School Boards; several members noted pending court cases and limited injunctions impacting a small number of districts.

The Siren School District Board of Education voted July 29 to adopt updated Title IX policy 1-13, its associated rule and exhibit, and an updated nondiscrimination policy (4-11).

An administrator (S4) presented an executive summary and said the district used model language provided by the Wisconsin Association of School Boards and consulted legal counsel. S4 told the board that while some Wisconsin districts have obtained limited injunctions against Department of Education enforcement, Siren is not on the list of affected districts, and the district was advised to move forward to remain in compliance.

Board members asked questions about the executive summary, coordinator roles and adoption dates. One member asked why the executive summary listed only one coordinator by name; administrators said they could add additional coordinator names or return the policy to the committee if members wanted more detail. The presenter emphasized the tight timeline for implementing the updated procedures and the district’s plan to provide training.

By motion and voice vote the board approved policy 1-13, its rule, and the associated exhibit and then approved the revised nondiscrimination policy. Administrators said policies can be revised later if court decisions or guidance change.

The board’s actions were framed as compliance with federal and state requirements, guided by legal counsel and association templates. There was no recorded public testimony opposing the adoptions during the meeting.