Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Turf And Golf Courses topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Residents press Oro Valley to focus on 'usage' not features in water-conservation draft
Summary
During a working-group review, residents argued the plan should prioritize reducing actual water use—especially by golf courses and large turf areas—rather than limiting decorative features; staff noted existing code and said wording and metrics will be clarified in the 30% draft.
Residents at the Oro Valley water working-group meeting urged the plan to target actual water usage rather than only restricting certain types of features.
"It should be the usage because water is an experience," said Rosa (resident), criticizing provisions she called focused on the "vessel" rather than consumption and urging measurable guidelines for discretionary water use on commercial and residential properties. Rosa and others said several neighborhoods use far more water because of turf, pools and landscape choices, and they argued for parity in reclaimed-water distribution across neighborhoods.
Staff acknowledged the concern and pointed to existing provisions in town code. Malini Sims, principal planner, and Peter Abraham, director of the water utility, noted the town already limits natural grass in new developments and restricts potable-water ornamental fountains in certain nonresidential settings. Sims said the plan can clarify what counts as "ornamental water features" and how the town's conservation code applies to town-managed properties.
The exchange included strong cost and impact claims from participants; those monetary and numeric estimates were presented by speakers as part of their testimony and were not verified by staff during the meeting. No formal motion or policy change was adopted; instead staff said they would revise language to better capture usage-based aims and equity concerns and include those clarifications in the consolidated draft.
