Resident alleges retaliatory police action that led to cousin's amputation; council asks for written request

Rockledge City Council · March 18, 2026

Loading...

AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

A Rockledge resident alleged at the March 18 meeting that city police carried out a '17-day medical blockade' he called retaliatory, resulting in his cousin's leg amputation; council members urged him to submit his concerns in writing and a motion to extend his speaking time failed for lack of a second.

A Rockledge resident, Mark Haro of 1420 Huntington Lane, used the council’s public-comment period on March 18 to allege serious misconduct by city employees and to request a recorded public hearing before the City Council.

Haro said he wants the council to “expose the State-created danger caused by employees of the City,” and he alleged that the Police Division “established a 17-day medical blockade via a retaliatory trespass that resulted in the amputation of his cousin’s leg.” He said he had met with Mayor Thomas J. Price, City Manager Dr. Brenda Fettrow and a city attorney previously and described that meeting as held in violation of the Sunshine Law.

Councilwoman Sammie Brown Martin moved to extend Haro’s three-minute public-comment period so he could finish; the motion failed for lack of a second. Martin then asked Haro what he expects from the city; Haro said he wants accountability and an investigation. Martin asked him to submit his requests in writing to staff and to copy the council. City Attorney Garrett Olsen clarified that a motion was on the table for consideration and later explained Haro’s time had expired and that the council had given direction to staff.

No council member committed to a public hearing during the meeting, and no formal investigative action was recorded during the session. The council’s recorded response at the meeting was to direct Haro to submit a written request to staff; the meeting record does not reflect any follow-up timeline or staff assignment made at the time.