Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Transportation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council approves Maple Grove Parkway jurisdictional transfer after resident objects to access impacts
Summary
Following a public hearing in which a nearby homeowner said the project had landlocked her property and left her with a long, unpaved driveway, the council adopted multiple resolutions and an ordinance enabling the Maple Grove Parkway/CSAH 121 project and related right-of-way actions.
After a public hearing on Nov. 17, the Maple Grove City Council approved a set of measures to finalize the Maple Grove Parkway (CSAH 121) extension, authorize a roadway jurisdictional transfer with Hennepin County, vacate certain right‑of‑way, and take related actions to resolve access and easement matters.
Public Works/Engineering Director Chris LaBounty told the council the Maple Grove Parkway extension will complete the CSAH 121 corridor, improve regional connectivity and better link the area to TH610. In presenting the project history, LaBounty described right‑of‑way acquisition, the elimination of the former Fernbrook Lane alignment, and staff recommendations for jurisdictional transfer and project establishment.
Dawn Cooper, a property owner at 10501 Fernbrook Lane North, testified she had lost public access, now has “a 1,000‑foot‑long driveway” in poor condition, and was not receiving regular garbage service after the road closure. She said she was presented with an access agreement that placed maintenance responsibility on her and that she had not been given adequate information about options before the road was closed.
Council took several formal steps after the hearing: it adopted Resolution No. 25‑152 approving a roadway jurisdictional transfer cooperative agreement with Hennepin County (motion by Councilmember Rachelle Johnson; second by Councilmember Jon McCullough); adopted Resolution No. 25‑153 vacating certain right‑of‑way and dedicating a trail easement; approved an ingress and egress easement declaration for PID 04‑119‑22‑140002; pulled and adopted Ordinance No. 25‑11 establishing a new street address and a summary ordinance to reduce publication costs; and adopted Resolution No. 25‑154 approving municipal state aid street 106 revocation. Each action passed on recorded votes of five ayes and no nays.
The council voted to receive a letter from the Cooper family’s attorney and closed the hearing after public comment. City staff indicated the city would commit to covering certain homeowner expenses for one year related to the address change. Council members asked clarifying questions on financial commitments and the terms of access agreements during the staff presentation and public hearing.
Next steps identified in the meeting record include final review of the jurisdictional transfer agreement by the city attorney and public works director prior to execution and the filing/implementation steps for the ordinances and resolutions.
