Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Corrections Staffing topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
JBC hears proposals to pilot shift‑relief funding for corrections amid staffing and overtime concerns
Summary
Analysts urged the committee to pilot funding (examples: $10 million) for a shift-relief factor to reduce overtime and long-term costs, offset by overtime reductions; members debated pilot versus full appropriation and risk of pushing costs to next year.
Get email alerts on the Corrections Staffing topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
JBC analysts presented options to address a multi‑year corrections staffing problem tied to high overtime and an unfunded PERA liability. Justin Brackie, JBC staff, said the committee could pilot a shift‑relief appropriation for targeted facilities and offset much of the cost by reducing overtime spending. He outlined a framework in which a $10 million appropriation for shift relief could be paired with a roughly one‑third reduction in overtime estimates, producing a net increase meaningfully below the full cost of the department's original proposal.
Why it matters: Committee members expressed urgency about staff burnout, service continuity and long-term costs to the Corrections Department; analysts said the problem has been building for years and may require a multi-year approach. Rejecting the request now could leave the shortfall to be addressed by supplementals or larger future requests.
What was proposed: Staff recommended several options ranging from partial piloting and targeted appropriations to the original larger FTE-based plan. Representative Taggart argued for a $10 million pilot targeted at facilities where hiring is feasible; other members preferred the smaller revised recommendation for near-term budget balance.
Quotes: "If you appropriate $10,000,000 for the shift relief factor, you could reduce overtime by a little over $3,000,000," Justin Brackie said explaining the offset logic. Representative Taggart urged the committee to pick a number and pilot it in a handful of facilities to test impacts on overtime and staffing.
Next steps: Staff offered to return quickly with facility-level costing and recommended pilot targets; the committee discussed but did not finalize a specific pilot appropriation at the March 23 meeting.
