Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Water Infrastructure topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Senate creates water and wastewater infrastructure fund, sets rural allocation priorities

Oklahoma State Senate · March 10, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Senate passed SB 1346 to establish a competitive water and wastewater loan fund administered by the Oklahoma Water Resources Board, with allocation priorities favoring smaller municipalities; debate focused on funding size, rural/urban splits and administrative fees.

The Oklahoma Senate approved Senate Bill 1346 by a 32–15 margin, establishing a water and wastewater infrastructure fund to be administered by the Oklahoma Water Resources Board (OWRB) and setting allocation priorities intended to benefit smaller municipalities and rural districts.

Senator Woods, who introduced the bill, described it as a framework to direct resources for water and wastewater projects. He and others said the measure is intended to improve access to infrastructure in rural Oklahoma by reserving a portion of funds for municipalities and districts with populations under 30,000.

Questions from the floor focused on the amount to be funded, the percentage breakdown that favors small communities, and whether the proposal duplicated or borrowed language from prior bills. Senator Hicks sought clarity about the 25%/50% distribution language for small communities and raised concerns about equitable distribution between rural and larger municipalities. The author said the allocation was intended to help smaller jurisdictions that lack bonding capacity and that the OWRB supplied data on statewide infrastructure needs.

The floor exchange also included an objection from Senator Bullard alleging that the language had been developed over five years and that borrowing or replicating others’ work should be acknowledged; proponents said similar bills have been filed by many members and that the measure was intended to be a collaborative vehicle for water investment.

On final passage the clerk reported 32 ayes and 15 nays; the Senate treated the bill as an emergency measure. Supporters said the fund will help rural communities finance critical water and wastewater repair and expansion; critics asked for clearer funding amounts and detailed prioritization criteria before final appropriation.

Next steps: establishment of the revolving account and later budgetary action to provide specific funding amounts and administration details when the measure is enrolled and transmitted under the emergency declaration.