Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use Code topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning Commission forwards wide package of land‑use code revisions, including limits on backyard animals and private‑lane standards
Summary
After a lengthy staff presentation and discussion, the Grantsville Planning Commission recommended that City Council consider amendments across multiple code chapters: family food production (animal limits/setbacks), private lane/street cross‑sections, deviations/variances, landscape/open‑space standards, and subdivision thresholds; the Commission moved to forward the package to council.
The Grantsville Planning Commission heard a comprehensive staff presentation March 17 on proposed amendments to the City’s Land Use Management Code covering definitions, family food production (animal keeping), private lane and street standards, conditional‑use procedures, landscape requirements, stormwater design, and subdivision thresholds.
Staff said the central goals were to clarify ambiguous definitions, consolidate signage language into chapter 20, address enforcement problems with rear‑yard retention basins, and tighten standards for maintenance of open space and park strips. On animal keeping, the draft sets minimum open‑area requirements and numeric limits: large animals require at least 10,000 square feet for the first animal and 2,000 square feet for each additional large animal; medium animals require 1,000 square feet per animal (not to exceed six per half acre); small animals (rabbits, poultry) require 100 square feet per animal with a limit per half acre. The draft also proposed that animal enclosures be set back at least 100 feet from any dwelling.
On private lanes and street cross sections, staff proposed a 60‑foot cross section (32 feet of asphalt) for private streets and clarified the rights and maintenance responsibilities where private lanes may later become public; a staff commenter cited examples where narrow private roads created long‑term maintenance problems. The proposed code reorganized preliminary and final plat approvals in line with state changes and removed a redundant subdivision level to reduce confusion.
A commission motion recommended that the City Council accept the Chapter 2 family food production amendments; subsequently the Commission moved to forward the broader package of chapter amendments for Council review. Commissioners asked staff to ensure consistent language on setback and open‑area calculations and to clarify which zones allow particular uses; staff said that conditional‑use vesting will remain in place for previously permitted uses.
The motions to recommend the Chapter 2 changes and to forward the larger package to City Council passed at the March 17 meeting; the City Council will receive the Commission's recommendations for consideration and possible adoption.
