Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use Rezone topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning commission backs rezone at 519 W. Main for proposed RV storage
Summary
The Grantsville Planning Commission unanimously recommended rezoning Parcel 01-066-0-0030 from A-10 to Shopping Commercial (C-S) to allow future commercial uses; the applicant said the immediate intention is open-air RV storage for about 75 units and a conditional use permit will follow.
Get email alerts on the Land Use Rezone topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Grantsville City Planning Commission on March 3 recommended approval of a rezone for Parcel 01-066-0-0030 at approximately 519 W. Main Street that would change the zoning from A-10 (agricultural) to the Shopping Commercial District (C-S).
Planning and Zoning Administrator Shelby Moore presented the proposal and said staff finds the request “consistent with the General Plan and Future Land Use Map,” adding that the change would “promote orderly commercial development along Main Street.” Moore noted the rezone would extend existing commercial zoning at the front of the parcel into the rear portion of the property.
Applicant Shelton Ross told the commission the site would be used for open-air RV storage, not occupancy, and estimated “approximately 75 units year-round.” Commissioners and staff clarified that operational details — including buffering, site layout, parking dimensions and the final number of spaces — will be evaluated during a later conditional use permit review when a detailed site plan is submitted.
Commissioner Cameron Moulton asked whether the storage would involve customers bringing RVs to the site; Ross confirmed the property would be used for storing RVs. Commissioner Gary Merrill described the request as straightforward and said it creates continuity with the surrounding commercial corridor.
Commissioner Jason Hill moved to recommend approval of the rezone; the motion passed unanimously with Chair Sarah Moore, Hill, Merrill and Moulton voting “Aye.” The Commission’s action was a recommendation to the City Council; any subsequent conditional use permit or development plans will be considered separately.
The Planning Commission recorded no public comments at the public hearing; staff noted no emails or phone calls had been received about the item.
