Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Wildlife Management topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
County agrees to enroll Treasure County land in state block‑management hunting program, explores longer habitat lease
Summary
After a presentation by a Fish, Wildlife & Parks representative, commissioners voted to enroll county land in the state block‑management program this year and asked staff to complete maps and sign‑up procedures; commissioners also discussed a longer habitat conservation lease as a possible future option.
Get email alerts on the Wildlife Management topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks (FWP) representative Steve Atwood described a block‑management option and a possible habitat‑lease alternative for Treasure County land and asked whether the county would like to participate. Atwood said FWP would reimburse block‑management cooperators on a per‑100‑day basis and provided maps and an estimate for Treasure County enrollment.
Atwood said the block‑management enrollment would generate an estimated $4,242 for the county for the coming season if the county participates with the PB Ranch block management area. He described administrative requirements — maps, signage, a cooperator contact and a sign‑in book or online signup option — and explained that cooperative landowners are reimbursed based on a multi‑year average of recorded "100‑day" sign‑ups.
Commissioners asked about trespass frequency, administrative workload and the county's right to temporarily close areas for ranch operations; Atwood said the county retains authority to restrict public access on county land as needed and that FWP attorneys cover recreational liability within the program. After discussion, a commissioner moved that Treasure County enroll the county parcel in the block‑management program; the motion was seconded and passed on a voice vote.
Commissioners asked staff to provide the parcel list and maps so FWP can finalize maps and printing and to assign a county contact who will receive inquiries from hunters. Atwood also described a longer habitat conservation lease (multi‑decade) as an option for a separate funding stream; commissioners asked to study that option and to consider whether a multi‑year lease would meet county needs before committing.
