Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Student Assessment topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Fall River reports state testing results, outlines interventions to boost growth scores

Fall River School District Board · December 19, 2024
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

District staff told the board Fall River scored 127 points above the state average across included forward/ACT measures but noted declines in growth; principals described targeted interventions, cohort analysis and professional development to improve outcomes.

District administrators presented state testing and report‑card data showing Fall River’s aggregate score was above the state average across included tests but that growth measures for some cohorts declined.

An administrator summarized that, across the tests presented, the district was 127 points above the state average on combined measures and compared favorably with nearby districts on many indicators. The report included elementary, middle and high school comparisons and the district report card for 2023–24.

Elementary principal Ryan credited consistent classroom management, varied instructional approaches, small‑group work, teacher collaboration and counselor supports for strong achievement; she acknowledged a dip in the district’s growth score and outlined six strategies to address it, including local I‑Ready data analysis, cohort tracking, instructional ladders, family engagement, targeted professional development and strengthened special‑education curriculum work. Ryan reported that of 28 students in the highest intervention tier last year, 16 exited Tier 3 interventions while 4 moved to special education.

Dr. Treckle (middle/high) said a particular freshman cohort underperformed relative to state averages and described plans to meet individually with those students, tighten intervention targeting and continue hiring/professional development to close observed gaps; he cited early improvements associated with a new 6–8 math curriculum and reported gains in percentages of students scoring advanced or proficient in some grade cohorts.

Board members requested follow‑up on cohort trends, intervention outcomes and how the district will measure the effectiveness of test‑preparation and tiered supports ahead of spring testing.