Subcommittee trims film incentive bill after testimony opposing targeted production subsidies

Chair introduced House Bill 38 32 on film incentives and called Dan Rogers of the State Film Commission to the table; Rogers identified himself and offered to answer questions.

Candace Carroll, director of public affairs for Americans for Prosperity South Carolina, testified in opposition. Carroll argued the bill would expand government direction of economic outcomes through targeted tax incentives and a new certification process, creating fairness and transparency concerns and adding complexity to the tax code. “At its core, this bill expands government's role in directing economic outcomes through targeted tax incentives and a new certification process for select productions,” Carroll said, and she urged members to oppose the bill.

The chair then moved two amendments: one to strike a committee amendment and return the bill to its original version, and a second to remove Broadway‑level production incentives, cap maximum rebates for qualifying film productions, and set preferences for in‑state workers and veterans. Members adopted the amendments by voice vote and then completed roll call procedures; the subcommittee reported HB3832 favorably as amended and the chair closed the meeting.

Supporters from the film commission were present to answer questions; opponents warned of fiscal and fairness risks from targeted incentives. The panel’s actions leave the film incentive language narrowed and advanced in the legislative process.