Senate rejects bid to suspend rules and move contraception bill to immediate third reading
Get AI-powered insights, summaries, and transcripts
Sign Up Free
Summary
A motion to suspend the Senate rules and immediately take SB 13-96 (concerning contraception rights) to third reading failed after a contested series of explanations and appeals; the floor announced the final tally as 12 ayes, 16 nays, 2 not voting.
The Arizona Senate declined to suspend its rules to take SB 13-96 to immediate third reading after members engaged in a protracted procedural exchange over germaneness and the proper floor process. The motion to suspend the rules was offered by a senator who said the bill "was never given a hearing" and urged that the chamber move the measure forward immediately.
Supporters argued the bill reflects a broadly held right to contraception and must be moved quickly because it had not received committee consideration. Senator Sundarasian (the motion sponsor on the floor) urged members to vote yes so the Senate could "move this bill immediately to third read because it was never given a hearing."
Opponents repeatedly raised points of order about the motion’s germaneness and the limited scope of debate on suspending rules. Senator Hoffman and others criticized attempts to use broad advocacy about the underlying bill as a reason to suspend rules, and several senators said explanation-of-vote remarks should be constrained to the procedural question.
After recorded and division votes during the exchange, the clerk announced the result as 12 ayes, 16 nays and 2 not voting, and the motion failed. No further action on SB 13-96 occurred that day.
The debate highlighted procedural tensions about when the floor can override committee processes to accelerate high‑profile bills and underscored differing views among senators about how and when contested social policy bills should proceed.
Next steps: With the motion defeated, SB 13-96 remained in its prior calendar position for normal committee consideration.