Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Infrastructure Procurement topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Council approves three engineering task orders totaling $208,875 for water and parking repairs

City Council of Melbourne · February 24, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Council approved three professional-services task orders: $59,571 for reverse-osmosis membrane bid specs, $69,974 for backwash pond design, and $79,330 for City Hall parking garage rehabilitation; all passed without recorded opposition.

The Melbourne City Council approved three professional-services task orders on Feb. 24 that together total $208,875.

Jennifer Spagnoli presented a Jacobs Engineering task order (JEG-18) to prepare bid specifications for replacement membranes at the Reverse Osmosis Water Treatment Plant; the service cost is $59,571. Council moved and approved the task order.

Staff then presented JEG-19, a Jacobs Engineering task order to design replacement of aging backwash ponds at the surface-water plant; the consulting fee is $69,974. That task order was approved.

The council also approved task order KHC2020 to Kimberly Horn (Melbourne) for professional engineering services to inspect and design repairs for the five-story City Hall parking garage (service life issues and damaged precast flange connections); the cost is $79,330. The scope includes inspection, structural assessment and preparation of repair plans and a long-term maintenance plan; the work is expected to be completed within 240 calendar days of notice to proceed.

All three items were moved, seconded and approved during the meeting; staff said the tasks are intended to keep critical infrastructure operating and to prepare projects for competitive bids or repairs.

The approval authorizes staff to proceed with the consultant scopes; specific construction contracts or funding appropriations, if needed beyond these professional services, were not approved at this meeting and would be brought forward as required.