Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Community Preservation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission considers low-cost 'historic certificate' program to reward property stewards
Summary
Commissioners discussed a proposal to issue modest framed certificates or thank-you notes to homeowners who preserve historic character. Staff will draft options and the proposer volunteered to write sample wording; members requested a draft for consideration in the coming months.
Get email alerts on the Community Preservation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
A La Crosse Heritage Preservation commissioner proposed creating a low-cost "historic certificate" program to recognize homeowners who take care of or sympathetically restore historic properties, and the commission asked staff to draft options for review.
The idea was presented as a positive, proactive step to encourage preservation through public acknowledgment rather than regulatory action. The proposer described simple tokens — laminated or framed certificates — delivered informally to homeowners and suggested the effort could generate a "snowball effect" encouraging neighbors to invest in maintenance.
Members discussed scope and logistics: whether the program should be restricted to properties in historic districts or open to any well-maintained property; how often certificates should be issued; whether the program could be handled quietly to preserve spontaneity; and modest budget implications. Staff noted certificates could come from the department budget depending on frequency and recommended a process to determine the certificate text and selection criteria.
Commission volunteers offered to collect nominations informally (for example, photographing properties and bringing them to a meeting). Staff agreed to circulate a draft form and the proposer volunteered to prepare sample wording. The group agreed to defer final design while busier agenda items are addressed and to consider a draft at a future meeting (the proposer suggested presenting in about two months).
No formal policy or funding allocation was approved; the action recorded was a direction that staff produce options and that the proposer and volunteers help draft materials for future consideration.
