Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Code Enforcement topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Proposed blight ordinance defeated by Scotland voters, 21–15
Summary
A proposed blight ordinance intended to discourage property deterioration and enable local enforcement was defeated 21–15 after debate over scope, P&Z authority, appeals and enforcement mechanisms.
A proposed blight ordinance was defeated at Scotland’s Special Town Meeting on Oct. 7 after a vote of 21–15. The measure, introduced by Jennifer Nelson and seconded by Charleen Perry, was presented as a local tool to deter property deterioration and to give the town stronger enforcement options than state statutory standards.
Moderator Wendy Sears read the ordinance purpose and First Selectman Dana Barrow Jr. explained the town’s rationale. Jeff Jakubowski noted Planning & Zoning’s limited powers under state law and asked why the town could not rely on state regulations. Supporters said the proposed ordinance would act as a local deterrent to prevent properties from reaching more serious conditions.
Speakers asked whether enforcement would be handled by a new “blight officer” or the existing zoning officer; officials said the zoning officer would likely handle day‑to‑day responsibilities and that appeals and court enforcement could follow if property owners failed to comply. Gerry Nelson asked whether the town could place a lien on a noncompliant property; officials said that was not planned as part of the ordinance and that court remedies would be the path for enforcement.
A motion to table the ordinance was withdrawn, the substantive process was described (complaint, inspection, appeal, officer decision, fine, court action), and the measure failed 21–15.
