Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Land Access topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Commission approves three approach/access permits, conditions bridge crossing on Army Corps approval

Duchesne County Commission · October 20, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Duchesne County commissioners approved three approach/access permits for private property access, including one with conditions that the applicant meet Army Corps specifications for a proposed crossing of Lower Red Creek. Approvals were made by voice vote.

Duchesne County commissioners approved three approach or access permits after brief review and conditions tied to environmental and engineering approvals.

The panel considered permit 25-051, which staff described as a standard approach along an existing road. Commissioner (speaker 2) moved to approve permit 25-051; the motion was seconded and carried by voice vote.

Commissioners next reviewed application 25-052, which involved a proposed crossing at Lower Red Creek. Staff told the commission the crossing may require a bridge or culvert and that the applicant would have to satisfy Army Corps of Engineers specifications. Commissioner (speaker 4) moved to approve 25-052 contingent on meeting Army Corps conditions; the motion was seconded and approved.

The board also approved approach 25-053, described as access for a spec residential build near Rossler Corner. Commissioners asked staff to confirm driveway spacing and traffic safety before final certification; a motion to approve with standard conditions passed by voice vote.

Each motion was taken in open session; commissioners confirmed they would follow standard permitting conditions and require any external permits (for example, Army Corps approvals) before construction over drainage features could proceed. No formal roll-call tallies were recorded in the transcript; approvals were recorded by voice vote.

The commission did not attach additional funding or project-specific terms beyond standard approach conditions and required outside approvals for waterways.