Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Budget Finance topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Snowline board certifies second interim budget; trustees warned of rising special-education costs and long-term gap

Snowline Joint Unified School District Board · March 11, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Trustees unanimously certified a "positive" second interim budget but were warned of a growing multi-year gap driven by lowered ADA projections and rising special-education costs (about $3.5M this year); the board asked staff for ongoing budget monitoring and further steps to address structural pressures.

Bill Flynn presented the district's second interim financial report and told trustees the board could certify a "positive" certification for the current year and the following two years, even as the report showed a growing gap driven primarily by special-education costs and changes in revenue assumptions.

Flynn described three principal contributors to the change since the budget: (1) lowered ADA projections (he said current year ADA was lowered by five due to enrollment trends and the district removed previously budgeted growth), (2) lower state COLA projections in the governor's January proposal for future years, and (3) additional special-education costs. He said special-education expenses increased by roughly $3.5 million this year after higher-than-expected SELPA-purchased services, with approximately $1.4 million coming in SELPA services beyond the district's allocation.

Trustees asked questions about the composition of the fund balance, the district's reserve targets (the board had previously set a higher-than-required reserve but Flynn said that uncommitted portion was reduced given current projections), and whether some items were one-time facility expenditures versus ongoing obligations. Board members pressed for scenarios that would close the projected $15 million ending-balance decline in year three and discussed the role of state budget actions, enrollment uncertainty and negotiations costs.

Flynn emphasized some one-time state proposals in the governor's budget could add to district cash but would not solve ongoing structural deficits, and he flagged enrollment uncertainty and the timing of modernization-related cash flows as variables. Trustees commended staff for early communication and a budget task force that includes bargaining representatives; the board unanimously approved the second interim certification by show of hands.

After the vote, trustees said they would continue reviewing targeted reductions, revenue options and reserves and requested further analysis on special-education drivers, staffing assumptions and potential mitigation strategies.