Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Assessments topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
El Monte board hears plan to use frequent classroom assessments to guide instruction
Summary
District assessment director Dr. Rudy Torres showed board members how classroom‑level common formative assessments (CFAs) and Para Assessment dashboards will let teachers act quickly on student needs; i‑Ready remains the district diagnostic with a five‑day window and guidance of about 90 minutes per subject.
The El Monte City School District on Oct. 20 heard a data‑driven push to move assessments closer to the classroom so teachers can adjust instruction in real time. Director of Instruction and Assessment Dr. Rudy Torres told the board that, beyond state and district diagnostics, the most actionable evidence will come from teacher‑led common formative assessments delivered through the Para Assessment platform.
"Probably the most important component of tonight's presentation are the classroom level data that's going to allow us to take action specifically around learning standards and essential standards," Torres said, describing a roll out of CFAs that will show question‑level performance for quick instructional changes.
Why it matters: District leaders said state results provide a broad picture but do not give immediate, classroom‑level signals. CFAs, written at grade level, are intended to be given frequently in a short cadence so professional learning communities can analyze results and modify instruction within weeks rather than months.
Torres gave a technical outline and fielded questions from board members about timing and student burden. He said the district's universal diagnostic, i‑Ready, was administered in a five‑day window (the week of Aug. 28) and is an adaptive tool that places students on appropriate learning paths. "iReady as a diagnostic is measuring all standards and is an adaptive test," Torres said. He added that i‑Ready guidance is about 90 minutes per subject and that CFAs are intended to operate on an approximately nine‑day instruction/10‑day assessment cycle so teachers can act in the next PLC meeting.
Torres demonstrated Para Assessment dashboards showing anonymized student identifiers and per‑question standard mapping. He emphasized that CFAs are not meant as a deficit report but as an "instructional view" that helps teachers identify where to target support.
Board members requested additional materials and samples of CFAs at multiple grade levels to see what students and teachers are being asked to do. Torres said the district will continue refining the CFA cadence and make adjustments for quarter two based on teacher feedback.
Next steps: The district will provide CFA samples and further data in upcoming presentations; board members signaled interest in seeing how grades and CFAs align in a future report.
