Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Special Education Complaints topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Parents tell CNUSD board alleged special‑education failures, call for board intervention
Summary
Multiple parents told the board their children were denied timely IEP services, citing frozen IEPs, delayed aides and alleged misapplication of IDEA; trustees said staff would follow up in writing but offered no immediate resolution on the record.
Multiple parents used the public‑comment period to make detailed allegations that Corona‑Norco Unified has failed to meet legal and practical obligations under IDEA and state law.
Eleanor Roosevelt senior Mikaela Rodriguez urged full implementation of IEPs and said her own diagnosis of depression, anxiety and ADHD was minimized before she obtained supports. “What I needed was for the school district to honor my external diagnosis and provide me with an IEP, not a 504,” she told trustees.
Parents representing the Van Horn family presented extended testimony alleging systemic misapplication of federal IDEA rules, including refusal to update IEPs after regression, misuse of the “stay put” provision to freeze services, failure to consider independent educational evaluations, and improper reliance on passing grades to deny eligibility. Ben Van Horn cited specific federal citations from the record and told the board the district’s actions amounted to a denial of a free appropriate public education (FAPE).
Angela Van Horn said repeated requests and board appearances had not prompted district action and accused the special‑education office of deflection and delay; she asked the board to direct the superintendent to resolve the disputes or offer settlement to avoid protracted litigation. Another parent, Megan Ortega, said her autistic son qualified for a 1:1 aide that was delayed for weeks, during which he suffered multiple injuries; she said the aide was placed only after she escalated with photo documentation and documentation of incidents.
The Board of Education offered no immediate remedial vote during the meeting; the chair thanked commenters and reiterated that staff would follow up with written communication and contact. Parents repeatedly asked the board to clarify how much the district spends on attorney fees and to use conflict resolution or settlement to avoid forcing families to file due process claims.
The district did not respond substantively to the parents’ claims during public comment; the transcript records the board saying staff will follow up and offering callers the district’s procedural safeguards and written follow‑up.
