Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Student Behavior And Safety topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Parents and teachers press Saugus board for faster action after repeated violent student incidents
Summary
At the Oct. 21 board meeting public commenters described repeated physical attacks and unsafe classrooms; the district's behavior council outlined priorities (research-based, blended interventions, SEL rollout, better data and communication) while parents and union leaders demanded clearer timelines, consistent recording of incidents and immediate protections for staff and students.
The Saugus Union School District board heard multiple parents, teachers and union representatives on Oct. 21 describe ongoing violent and disruptive student behavior they said is damaging classrooms and threatening staff safety.
"Once a child gets physical, it is no longer a behavior issue, it's a safety issue," one public commenter told the board, describing repeated incidents and urging immediate consequences and clearer communication from district leadership. Parent Leah Ridgeley said she only learned her kindergartner had been repeatedly struck with a metal water bottle when she volunteered in class: "I was shocked and heartbroken that I hadn't heard this from an adult," she said.
Representatives of the Saga Teachers Association and classified staff told the board a recent member survey and staff reports show "serious incidences of extreme behaviors" and inconsistent reporting. Linda Valdez, speaking for STA, said the council's focus has felt skewed toward universal (Tier 1) strategies while teachers seek actionable guidance for more intensive Tier 3 behaviors.
District leaders on the behavior council presented a multi-part plan the board can use to guide next steps. Tanya Nowakowski, director of student support services, and council members said the group has three top priorities: adopt a research-based blended approach that draws on PBIS, Capturing Kids' Hearts and Conscious Discipline; roll out the new CharacterStrong social-emotional curriculum with fidelity; and improve community communication so the district and families share a single "whole child" vision.
Courtney Ellis, a behavior intervention specialist and council member, said the council is building a matrix of evidence‑based tools and a subcommittee will work to streamline district definitions and data reporting. "Not one program is going to suffice," she said, describing a blended approach and cautioning that Tier 3 responses remain individualized.
Board members pressed the council on training reach, fidelity and data. Several asked for quick, shareable deliverables such as (a) a clear list of recommended training and who must receive it, (b) standardized definitions to make Panorama/ODR data comparable across sites, and (c) a short set of district nonnegotiables tied to the 'whole child' definition. A district official said work is underway and that a demographically delivered data standardization subcommittee will report back.
The meeting featured an extended, at-times tense exchange over the council's size and oversight. Some speakers urged the board to convert the behavior council into a smaller, formal board committee with explicit timelines and oversight to accelerate action; others warned that formal board control can slow operational work and recommended the board ask the council for concrete priorities and phased recommendations instead.
What happens next: the behavior council said it will return with a prioritized set of deliverables (consequences matrix drafts, fidelity measures, and data‑collection standards) and recommended training pathways; the board scheduled a "whole child" community session for Jan. 21, 2026 to continue the public discussion. The council also plans further subcommittee work on Panorama calibration and implementation timelines.
The record: public testimony, union statements and the behavior council presentation were recorded in the board's Oct. 21 meeting materials and were followed by questions from board members and staff about training cadence, data fidelity and timelines for implementation.
