Teacher and commenters press board for transparency after math‑sequence decision

During public comment, Jamieson Leroy Reginald urged the board to share the math‑sequence vote tally and to involve the math advisory committee before finalizing curriculum decisions. "Why doesn't this very important group of math teachers get to have a discussion about the possible change, especially if the vote was really as close as it was 50‑50?" he asked.

Leroy also asked for details about a paid consultant: who was hired, how many consultants, how much they were paid, and which teachers they met with. The commenter said the decision felt rushed and asked the board to "pause" the change until advisory committee review.

Board President Pardue responded that the district staff had been relied upon to communicate with teachers and that the board believed the necessary steps were in place when it made its direction. "We want to make sure people feel like they're involved in that process," Pardue said, acknowledging gaps and offering to revisit communications. He noted the practical need to select curricular materials (books) in a timely manner.

Bob Cowell, another public commenter, asked for public records including polling questionnaires and bond sunsetting schedules. He also questioned a posted bond amount and asked the district to provide documentation; district staff advised him of public‑records channels.

The board did not take a formal vote on curriculum at this meeting; members discussed follow‑up steps, including greater outreach to teachers and providing requested information to the public.