Lifetime Citizen Portal Access — AI Briefings, Alerts & Unlimited Follows
Sioux City council debates armored 'Bearcat' vehicle; staff say purchase funded by transfers, council raises optics concerns
Loading...
Summary
Councilors questioned the purchase of a Lenco Bearcat armored vehicle for police use, citing militarization optics, cost and whether used alternatives were considered; police and finance staff defended the need and said funds come from transfers, and the purchase was included in the consent agenda.
Council members questioned the procurement of a Lenco Bearcat armored vehicle during review of the consent agenda, pressing police officials on vehicle necessity, funding and whether used options were exhausted.
Captain Bridal Bertrand said the Bearcat model is effectively a sole‑source product and described operational advantages over the department’s current military-surplus MRAP, particularly maneuverability, a purpose-built cupola and improved rescue capability. “This particular model would have a purpose built cupola that would provide protection,” Bertrand said, arguing the vehicle would assist in high-risk rescues and natural-disaster responses.
Council members pressed on cost, lead time and optics. One councilor noted the city already had a military-surplus MRAP and asked why the city could not reuse or obtain a secondhand vehicle; Bertrand said used vehicles are rare and tend to be claimed by other agencies when available. Finance Director Theresa Fitch said the purchase is funded via a transfer, not bonding, which allowed staff to move forward under current budget procedures.
Council members expressed concern about the appearance of militarization and asked staff to check whether used vehicles were available and whether the vendor would hold pricing. Bertrand said the vendor had been willing to hold price and staff would follow up on availability.
The Bearcat purchase was part of the consent agenda the council approved during the meeting; discussion occurred during the consent‑agenda review and council later approved the consent items as presented. No separate recorded amendment or split vote on the Bearcat purchase was taken during the meeting.
Council members said they would continue to seek transparency on procurement and consider cost-sharing or coordination with the county on specialized equipment.
