Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Council Votes topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council approves refunds, equipment and salt purchases; refers municipal ID and ordinance revisions to committee
Summary
The Common Council voted to approve tax refunds of $11,557, authorized a $17,843.29 purchase order for a Toro sprayer, approved a prior purchase order for road salt (~$174,020 for 2,000 tons), and referred ordinance-penalty revisions and a municipal identification study to committee; a motion to reconsider an earlier resolution was ruled out of order.
At its March 11 meeting the Common Council of New Britain approved several routine and operational items and recorded a procedural ruling on a motion to reconsider a previously passed resolution.
Key outcomes:
- Motor-vehicle and real-estate refunds: The council approved a report authorizing $11,557 in refunds and overpayments to taxpayers. The motion carried on a voice vote.
- Equipment for Public Works: The council authorized a purchase order to Snow White Outdoor Power Equipment (Southington, CT) in the amount of $17,843.29 for a Toro junior sprayer to replace a 24-year-old spreader; the motion passed unanimously.
- Road salt: The council confirmed a purchase order previously authorized on July 9, 2025, under the Capital Region Council of Governments cooperative pricing; Morton Salt was the low bidder and the purchase order covers approximately 2,000 tons for the 2025–26 winter season at an amount stated in the record as $174,020.
- Ordinance penalty revisions and municipal ID study: The council referred a resolution to revise penalty sections of the city code (animals, health, blight, housing) to the Administration, Finance and Law and Public Service committee. The body also referred a study to evaluate creating a New Britain municipal identification card program; findings are to be reported within 12 months and any future program would require mayoral and council approval.
- Motion to reconsider: Alderman Simpson moved to reconsider item #37071 but the presiding officer and counsel disputed whether the motion was in order because it was not on the agenda for this meeting; the chair ruled the motion out of order and no reconsideration occurred at the March 11 session.
The meeting adjourned with a motion to close at 9:00 p.m.
