Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Code Enforcement topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Dixmoor trustees debate a nuisance/greenery ordinance aimed at overgrown lots and liens
Summary
Trustees discussed a proposed ordinance to address weeds, trees and overgrown lots; staff said the village could place liens on neglected properties and pursue remediation, while trustees raised concerns about easements, privately owned trees and jurisdictional boundaries.
Trustees debated a proposed nuisance and greenery ordinance intended to address overgrown vacant lots, hedges and trees that staff say have been neglected by owners and banks.
"What we have ... is something that we're trying to get in place because we have a lot of people on vacant lots and they got all this wild trees and grass on it," a staff speaker said, arguing the village should be able to place liens or take action to encourage development and remove unsafe or overgrown vegetation.
Trustees asked whether the proposed enforcement would apply to easements and land outside the village's property lines. One trustee asked whether the ordinance would allow the village to cut vegetation that overhangs village property; staff said property owners remain responsible for trees on their lots but the ordinance would create mechanisms (fines, liens) to compel maintenance where necessary. Several trustees discussed confusion over which side of the sidewalk certain parcels fall on and the difficulty that misaligned county records introduce.
The board did not record a final ordinance adoption vote in the provided transcript excerpt. Trustees asked staff to refine the language so it clarified responsibility for trees in easements and to define enforcement steps and notice procedures before a lien is placed.
