Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Historic Preservation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board debates historic preservation approach for master plan—opt‑in overlays favored by some
Summary
Members disagreed over converting the historic advisory committee into a preservation commission and whether to list addresses/block and lot entries for historic sites; some argued for an opt‑in approach and owner outreach, others warned about adding another regulatory body.
Somerville27s planning board discussed the historic‑preservation element of the draft master plan, including whether to escalate the existing advisory committee into a legally empowered historic preservation commission and how to identify designated historic properties in the plan.
One member urged the board to consider upgrading the advisory committee to a preservation commission to act as a gatekeeper for preservation decisions and to reduce litigation exposure, saying a commission 22would be the gatekeeper22 and could make recommendations to the planning board. Others warned that creating a new commission adds another layer of government and could bog down homeowners and the planning board with additional reviews.
Board members also debated whether to include physical addresses or block/lot identifiers for known historic sites in the master plan. Several members favored an opt‑in approach that invites property owners to participate rather than automatically listing addresses, and recommended education and small, actionable steps such as historic placards to encourage preservation without imposing mandatory controls.
The board agreed to take smaller, actionable steps on the historic element, ask for targeted homework on specific recommendations, and continue the discussion at the next meeting.
