Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Building Code topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Vernon Hills staff outline building‑code update, board considers local amendments

Village Board of Vernon Hills · January 14, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Staff briefed the Committee of the Whole on replacing the village’s 2018 International Code with an updated model‑code package; trustees discussed local amendments (concrete landings, sump pumps, accessibility triggers and special architectural appearance) and directed staff to return with a voting ordinance (target Feb. 3; effective date aimed for about March 1).

Village staff presented a multi‑month effort to update Vernon Hills’ building code and asked the Committee of the Whole to review draft language before a formal adoption ordinance.

Andrew (introduced by staff) explained the village currently uses the 2018 International Code and described the standard practice of adopting a model code supplemented by state‑mandated plumbing, energy and accessibility chapters and local amendments. He said staff compared the model code to the village’s existing local amendments, solicited input from neighboring fire districts, and worked with the elevator consultant on mandated elevator‑program language.

Andrew highlighted several local issues under consideration: tying exterior concrete landings to foundations so door egress remains operable over time; permitting sump pumps on dedicated circuits so ground‑fault interrupters do not trip critical pumps; drip pans for washing machines in multiunit buildings to protect units below; and accessibility triggers for automatic door openers in larger buildings. He noted the village retains full control over the special architectural appearance section (currently requiring masonry) and asked whether the board wants staff to return with options that would update acceptable exterior materials and percentage‑of‑elevation requirements.

Trustees raised process questions about appeals. One trustee argued against creating a separate three‑trustee appeals committee and favored handling appeals through the full board and existing committee structure; staff said they would fold appropriate boilerplate language into the committee structure while preserving the board’s ability to seek outside experts when needed.

Staff told the committee the next procedural step is to prepare the adoption ordinance in voting form for consideration by the full board, targeting a Feb. 3 vote and an effective date near March 1 so the village can align the update with the upcoming construction season. Additional, more technical amendments may take longer and will return to the board for further discussion.