Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Utilities topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council debates sewer tap and street-cut fees, staff outlines engineered sewer-extension solution
Summary
Councilors questioned whether sewer tap charges and reimbursable street-cut costs unfairly burden property owners on the opposite side of roads or state highways; staff said a sewer extension for Monument Place has engineering plans and is awaiting DEQ approval so businesses can connect without paying extraordinary bore costs.
Councilors spent extended time discussing equity and cost differences tied to sewer tap fees and reimbursable street-cut charges. Some councilors argued property owners on one side of the road face prohibitive costs—particularly where the sewer is physically on the far side of a state-maintained highway and trenching is not allowed; in one case staff and a councilor referenced an estimate of up to $20,000 to bore under the highway.
Council discussion clarified the difference between the flat sewer-tap fees ($100 for existing residential, $300 for new single-family, $400 for commercial plus per-apartment fees) and variable reimbursable street-cut costs (charged at material cost by linear foot and reimbursed to the city). Staff explained that in the Monument Place situation engineering plans were drafted to extend the sewer line across the road, set a manhole and enable businesses to connect; the city is awaiting DEQ approval before construction.
Several councilors asked whether an ordinance is needed to equalize costs. Staff and others said the underlying issue is a lack of physical infrastructure rather than policy: extending sewer lines or budgeting for infrastructure to fill missing links is the appropriate remedy, not simply changing a fee schedule.
What’s next: staff will pursue the DEQ approval and bring an infrastructure solution (sewer extension) forward; council did not adopt a new ordinance at the meeting.
