Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Transportation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commissioners pause Rocky Fork phase‑1 construction vote after right‑of‑way discrepancy; ask for itemized cost breakdown
Summary
Staff said right‑of‑way was acquired for two phase‑1 intersections and estimated construction at about $1.5 million, but commissioners discovered the Newsom Lane right‑of‑way had not been purchased as expected; the board asked staff for documents and a breakdown by intersection before any construction vote.
Get email alerts on the Transportation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Board of Commissioners paused action on plans to send Rocky Fork Road phase‑1 construction to bid after staff and commissioners uncovered a discrepancy over which intersections had right‑of‑way acquired.
Engineering staff reported that right‑of‑way was complete for two intersections included in the current phase and that the combined construction estimate stands about $1.5 million. However, several commissioners were surprised to learn that the Newsom Lane intersection — previously expected to be part of the phase — did not have right‑of‑way purchased. "I am quite frankly shocked by that," the mayor (speaker 3) said, asking staff to circulate all contract and acquisition documents for board review.
Commissioners requested an itemized cost breakdown by intersection and asked staff to provide drawings showing the specific improvements planned for each location. Staff said mobilization costs and the quantity‑driven estimate could change if the board asked to break the project into separate bids; doing intersections together reduces duplicated mobilization costs.
Several commissioners emphasized safety concerns along Rocky Fork and said Newsom Lane remains a top priority based on past crash data and traffic volume. Board members suggested that, if necessary, the town should consider purchasing Newsom Lane right‑of‑way separately (the acquisition estimate was previously discussed as being substantially lower than construction costs) so the highest‑risk intersection can be advanced.
No motion to put the construction out to bid was approved at the work session; staff agreed to provide the requested documents and cost breakdown to the commissioners in short order so the board can revisit the item.
