Rockbridge supervisors authorize bond to build long-discussed recreation center after heated public debate
Loading...
Summary
After hours of public testimony for and against, the Rockbridge County Board of Supervisors voted to authorize a bond package to fund a new Rockbridge Recreation Center at Rockbridge County High School; supporters said it addresses decades of unmet needs, while opponents warned of long‑term costs and urged a prioritized capital plan.
The Rockbridge County Board of Supervisors voted March 23 to authorize a bond to finance construction of a Rockbridge Recreation Center at Rockbridge County High School, approving a bond authorization with a not‑to‑exceed ceiling in line with staff recommendations.
The decision followed an hours‑long public hearing and a presentation from Davenport & Company financial adviser Tyler Smith, who said the county is in a “very strong position financially” and that a debt structure using some available cash for a debt service reserve could allow issuance without an immediate tax increase under current assumptions.
Supporters, including representatives of RARO (the local recreation organization), the schools and business groups, urged supervisors to approve the bond. Chad Coffey, director of RARO, said the project is essential to meet existing program demand and that postponing construction will only raise costs: “Can we afford not to build it? Holding off to build anything is only going to cost more money,” he said.
Developer‑ and community‑oriented testimony followed. Joey Jones, RARO chair, urged the board to treat the center as an economic and social anchor, saying the project could host tournaments and programs that bring visitors and spending to the county.
Opponents and cautious speakers focused on fiscal tradeoffs and long‑term operating expenses. Dan Lyons, a former finance committee member, urged fiscal restraint and questioned whether borrowing now is the best option. Several residents called for a countywide prioritized capital plan, noting other deferred maintenance and planned projects— including courthouse and school renovations and potential jail costs—that will also affect future debt capacity.
During board deliberations supervisors debated feasibility, the project’s suitability across the county and affordability. Supervisor Steve Hart highlighted future operating and maintenance costs and urged a deliberate approach to debt and priorities. Supervisor Lewis moved to adopt the bond resolution and Miss Ayers seconded.
When the board voted, Supervisors Lewis, Ayers and Chairman McGann announced votes in favor; Supervisors Day and Hart announced votes against. The motion passed.
The board’s authorization moves the recreation center project forward to the next financing steps. The county will work with its financial advisers to finalize the terms of the issuance and will report to the board on the schedule and any further public or intergovernmental coordination.
